This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@cygnus.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
> >It's good for collecting money from people who don't have the time or pockets >for a good defense. If you think this is stupid, the courts where this would >be decided, are even more gullible than the patent office. I'm truely afraid >of the patent system these days. It's another manifestation of a country run >by lawyers and built by engineers. We would do without the lawyers. > >-brian > >-----Original Message----- >From: Joel Sherrill [SMTP:joel@OARcorp.com] >Sent: Thursday, February 05, 1998 9:25 AM >To: Brian Cuthie >Subject: RE: Results of "downloading compressed program images" request > > >I am still tying to figure out what exactly do they think they have >patented? It seems like (as you point out) they have patented any thing >which plugs together with connectors. Even if you assume they mean >converters there are plenty of those dating back years. RS-232->RS-422 >converters have been around for years. I have a serial->parallel >converter for a printer around 1982 and it wasn't new then. Even a >network print server with some smarts seems to be prior work. I don't se >that this patent has any legitimacy. Can you think of one thing it is >good for? > >--joel > >On Wed, 28 Jan 1998, Brian Cuthie wrote: > >> >> For those who think the US Patent and Trademark office actually serves >> any useful purpose, I present the following counter-evidence: >> >> The big news today is that Motorola is being sued by a company called >> "General Patent International" for infringing on the following patent. >> Does anyone really think that General Patent International is interested >> in the free interchange of ideas and information? These guys sound more >> like that new breed of lawyers who run around and buy patents just to >> sue everyone they can find. Bigger fish, like Motorola, are more >> interesting, of course. >> >> If this patent is enforced, no one can make anything with two connectors >> on it. God Bless America. >> >> Pat Reg# 4,603,320 >> ABSTRACT >> "A connector interface for enabling communications between first and >> second data handling systems wherein the data in the first system is >> arranged in a first type of format and the data in the second system is >> arranged in a second type of format, includes a connector housing with >> first and second sets of electrical contact elements exposed at >> different portions of the housing. Circuitry contained entirely within >> the housing operates to convert data transmitted to the first set of >> contact elements from the first data handling system into corresponding >> data in the second type of format for transmission to the second data >> handling system through the second set of contact elements, and to >> convert data transmitted to the second set of contact elements from the >> second data handling system into corresponding data in the first format >> for transmission to the first data handling system. One set of >> electrical contact elements may, for example, be arranged to extend out >> from the connector housing in two parallel rows to allow the elements to >> be directly connected to corresponding terminals arranged in a dual in >> line configuration on an outside printed circuit board. The connector >> arrangement greatly simplifies the design and construction of data >> processing systems requiring specific interfaces between certain parts >> of the systems, such as between data terminal equipment and data >> communication equipment employing serial binary data interchange." >> >