This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Gold patch to create separate output sections for certain text section prefixes


FYI, I have back-ported this to the binutils-2_29-branch.

Thanks
Sri


On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 6:51 PM Sriraman Tallam <tmsriram@google.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 6:35 PM, Sriraman Tallam <tmsriram@google.com>
> wrote:
> > 6bly=
> > ]ol lr6ub∞¬ø≠ºik m jjlknlgkubvgrf7tuvfrvc6wer`w
>
> Sorry about this.  My son jumped on the keyboard :) and accidentally
> hit send before I could even finish.
>
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 6:24 PM, Cary Coutant <ccoutant@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> However, we found out that creating multiple executable ELF segments
> >>> has other issues as some other tools like symbolizers make assumptions
> >>> about ELF binaries having just one executable segment and this breaks
> >>> them.  We are looking at fixing these but an alternate approach gives
> >>> us flexibility in deploying this.
> >>
> >> Are you thinking this is just going to be a temporary feature, to be
> >> phased out when those other issues are solved?
> >
> > Thanks for reviewing.  I was hoping this would be permanent as like
> > you noted these markers are really useful.
>
> Also, there are two ways in which various subsets of text are mapped
> to huge pages.  One is by going through the sections in a particular
> segment and the other way is to map only one executable segment.  I
> want to be able to support both.
>
> >
> >>
> >> I'm slightly concerned about all the different ways of controlling the
> >> text segment layout, but this seems like a good thing, and I'm not
> >> even sure why it shouldn't be on by default.
> >
> > Agreed.
> >
> >>
> >>> * layout.cc (Layout::default_section_order): Check for text section
> >>> prefixes.
> >>> (Layout::text_section_name_mapping): New static member.
> >>> (Layout::text_section_name_mapping_count): New static member.
> >>> (Layout::match_section_name): New static function.
> >>> (Layout::output_section_name): Check for text section prefixes.
> >>> * layout.h (Output_section_order::ORDER_TEXT_HOT): New enum value.
> >>> (Output_section_order::ORDER_TEXT_STARTUP): New enum value.
> >>> (Output_section_order::ORDER_TEXT_EXIT): New enum value.
> >>> (Output_section_order::ORDER_TEXT_UNLIKELY): New enum value.
> >>> (Layout::text_section_name_mapping): New static member.
> >>> (Layout::text_section_name_mapping_count): New static member.
> >>> (Layout::match_section_name): New static function.
> >>> * options.h (keep_text_section_prefix): New -z option.
> >>> * testsuite/Makefile.am (keep_text_section_prefix): New test.
> >>> * testsuite/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
> >>> * testsuite/keep_text_section_prefix.cc: New test source.
> >>> * testsuite/keep_text_section_prefix.sh: New test script.
> >>
> >> +  DEFINE_bool(keep_text_section_prefix, options::DASH_Z, '\0', false,
> >> +       N_("Keep .text.hot, .text.startup, .text.exit and
> .text.unlikely "
> >> + "as separate sections in the final binary."),
> >> +       N_("Merge all .text.* prefix sections (default)."));
> >>
> >> Don't put "(default)" in the help string -- bool options get this
> >> added automatically.
> >>
> >> This is OK with that fix. Thanks! (And sorry for the delay.)
> >>
> >> -cary
>
> Thanks
> Sri
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]