This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] x86: {f,}xsave64 / {f,}xrstor64 / xsaveopt64 should not allow q suffix


On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 4:31 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> Just like is the case for xsave{s,c}64 and xrstors64 already. I wonder
> though why xsave{s,c} and xrstors don't allow for the q suffix, other
> than the other insns without the "64" suffix do.

commit eacc9c891d71cfef7f5c1f152291daeab785b3d4
Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri Dec 4 07:51:41 2009 +0000

    Support fxsave64 and fxrstor64.

    gas/testsuite/

    2009-12-03  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>

            * gas/i386/i386.exp: Run x86-64-fxsave and x86-64-fxsave-intel.

            * gas/i386/rex.d: Updated for fxsave64.

            * gas/i386/x86-64-fxsave-intel.d: New.
            * gas/i386/x86-64-fxsave.d: Likewise.
            * gas/i386/x86-64-fxsave.s: Likewise.

were added after fxsaveq was introduced.   Otherwise, fxsaveq won't have been
there.

> opcodes/
> 2017-11-10  Jan Beulich  <jbeulich@suse.com>
>
>         * i386-opc.tbl (fxsave64, fxrstor64, xsave64, xrstor64,
>         xsaveopt64): Add No_qSuf.
>         * i386-tbl.h: Re-generate.
>

OK.  Thanks.


-- 
H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]