arm64:
Test results, compared with installed binutils:
I: [ld-elf/shared.exp] progression (FAIL -> PASS): Run pr19579
W: [ld-elf/shared.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): Run dl6a2 with
-Bsymbolic-functions and dlopen on libdl6a.so
W: [ld-elf/shared.exp] XPASS: Run pr19719 fun undefined
W: [ld-elf/shared.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): Run dl6a5 with
-Bsymbolic-functions --dynamic-list-cpp-new and dlopen on libdl6a.so
W: [ld-elf/shared.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): Run dl6a7 with
--dynamic-list-data -Bsymbolic and dlopen on libdl6a.so
W: [ld-elf/shared.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): Run dl6a6 with
--dynamic-list-cpp-new -Bsymbolic-functions and dlopen on libdl6a.so
W: [ld-aarch64/aarch64-elf.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): ld-aarch64/dt_textrel
W: [ld-gc/gc.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): --gc-sections with KEEP
6 REGRESSIONS (0.34%).
2 progressions (0.11%).
1790 tests: 1748 pass (97.65%), 14 fail (0.78%), 11 xfail (0.61%) 1 untested
(0.06%).
I don't see these (probably because of the configure options), but on
native builds I see:
ld/testsuite/ld-elf/indirect.exp ...
FAIL: Run indirect5 3
FAIL: Run indirect5 4
FAIL: indirect5c dynsym
FAIL: indirect5d dynsym