Re: Vendor branches on sourceware.org's binutils-gdb repo

[Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>]

On 27 Jun 2016 20:10, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 6/27/16 2:14 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > did we decide anything ?  seems like we didn't.
> > 	https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2014-04/msg00068.html
> > 
> > i'm debating whether to move Gentoo's branches over like i do
> > already for glibc:
> > 	https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=heads
> 
> I can't find the post, but we did come to a consensus that vendor
> and personal branches should come under the .../users/<vendor|user>/
> directory.

sounds good.  i'll see about moving Gentoo's binutils & my gdb changes up.

> Currently, IBM and ARM have vendor branches and there are quite a
> few personal branches too:

i saw, but it wasn't clear to me whether it was one-off or "sanctioned".

thanks!
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature