This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: add vulcan support to gas
- From: Syed Faisal Akber <faisal at akber dot net>
- To: Virendra Pathak <virendra dot pathak at broadcom dot com>, binutils at sourceware dot org
- Cc: Virendra Kumar Pathak <kumarvir dot pathak at gmail dot com>, nickc at redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 06:10:26 -0700
- Subject: Re: add vulcan support to gas
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CANx+fTAsJtE27XTwVV8Cx9mZT4Nwn4eotTRNB1wf3yU0xqR5Mw at mail dot gmail dot com>
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
From: Virendra Pathak
Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 04:56
Cc: Virendra Kumar Pathak; firstname.lastname@example.org
Subject: add vulcan support to gas
Hi binutils group,
We have a patch for adding -mcpu=vulcan support to gas.
Broadcom's Vulcan is a armv8-a aarch64 served based processor.
We have also got company wide FSF agreement for contributing to
However, recently I read on this group that now gcc does not pass
-mcpu flag to binutils. GCC now passes -march flag to binutils.
I verified this by compiling a simple hello world inspecting the
Keeping this in mind, do we still need to add -mcpu=vulcan support to
gas, given that many armv8-a vendors have done it?
Kindly guide me on this.
Please also find the patch (-mcpu=vulcan) attached with this mail for review.
Tested the patch with aarch64-linux-gnu cross build,
aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu native build and make check (ld,gdb,gas,binutils).
Also verified the new option via command line.
Thanks for your time.
* config/tc-aarch64.c (aarch64_cpus): Add vulcan.
* doc/c-aarch64.texi : Document that vulcan is a valid processor name