This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Relative DT_RPATH/DT_RUNPATH vs. sysroot capable ld.

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 02:04:13PM -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, Alan Modra wrote:
> > This fixes two problems.  First, the --sysroot option wasn't available
> > with a ld configured without --with-sysroot, a historical accident.
> > This led to people configuring binutils with --with-sysroot=/ in order
> > to enable sysroot support, which exposes a case where ld wrongly
> > prepends the sysroot to a relative path.
> >
> > 	PR ld/18992
> > 	* ldmain.c (main): Always enable --sysroot.
> > 	* emultempl/elf32.em (gld${EMULATION_NAME}_after_open): Don't
> > 	prepend sysroot to relative rpath/runpath.
> I though this would break some case in
> testsuite/ld-scripts/sysroot-prefix.exp but apparently not.
> (I re-checked with --with-sysroot=/tmp/somewherenotfound
> toolchains.)
> Still, it could do with some adjustment: parts of the table can
> be folded now that there's no "non-sysroot" (it's now the same
> as sysroot == "/" IIUC).

Yes, I noticed that too.  I was hoping someone else would take care of
adjusting the sysroot tests.  I think you know who I'm looking at.  :)
Preapproved.  Actually, you probably ought to be reviewing my
testsuite changes rather than the other way around.  If you'd like to
be listed as a testsuite maintainer, you have my vote.

Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]