This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Support PIE on Solaris 12
- From: Rainer Orth <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
- To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com>, Binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 15:46:25 +0200
- Subject: Re: Support PIE on Solaris 12
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <yddd1yb7fgm dot fsf at lokon dot CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE> <CAMe9rOr8Y059NZ2D2uP2TLwyipzBrWDrNRtTDP7eqnYZKQdi7A at mail dot gmail dot com> <ydd1teijqjb dot fsf at lokon dot CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE> <CAMe9rOrHK7vmy43j4+eoFjB4e_N89f_3oZXGTTAdGoLTOomTgA at mail dot gmail dot com> <ydd4mjdgpho dot fsf at lokon dot CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE> <20150902125127 dot GV24814 at bubble dot grove dot modra dot org> <yddtwr2cxk0 dot fsf at lokon dot CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE> <CAMe9rOrbYEoJS693SciwZsgk3SGbSnPSb-CowD+MeO2Dq-uh3A at mail dot gmail dot com>
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:40 AM, Rainer Orth
> <ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
>> Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 11:05:55AM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
>>>> 2015-08-25 Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
>>>>
>>>> ld:
>>>> * emulparams/solaris2.sh (GENERATE_PIE_SCRIPT): Set to yes.
>>>>
>>>> * emultempl/elf32.em (ld_${EMULATION_NAME}_emulation): Allow
>>>> overriding gld${EMULATION_NAME}_handle_option.
>>>> * emultempl/solaris2.em: Include ldlex.h.
>>>> (gld${EMULATION_NAME}_handle_option): Declare.
>>>> (elf_solaris2_handle_option): New function.
>>>> (LDEMUL_HANDLE_OPTION): Uset it.
>>>>
>>>> include/elf:
>>>> * common.h (DF_1_STUB, DF_1_PIE): Define.
>>>>
>>>> binutils:
>>>> * readelf.c (process_dynamic_section): Handle DF_1_STUB, DF_1_PIE.
>>>
>>> OK.
>>
>> How should we proceed with this patch? Keep setting DF_1_PIE
>> Solaris-specific as in the version above you've already approved or set
>> it everywhere as HJ suggested, using the ld part from
>>
>> https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2015-09/msg00035.html
>>
>> instead.
>
> We have set bits in DT_FLAGS_1 which ld supports. I don't see
> DF_1_PIE is special.
It's been more than a week since this mail: can I have either approval
or rejection for generically setting DF_1_PIE so I can install either
version of the patch?
Thanks.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University