This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH] x86/Intel: accept mandated operand order for vcvt{,u}si2s{d,s}
- From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich at suse dot com>
- To: "Mark Wielaard" <mjw at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>,<binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 10:41:19 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/Intel: accept mandated operand order for vcvt{,u}si2s{d,s}
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <552FE0630200007800072CD0 at mail dot emea dot novell dot com> <1433150265 dot 4538 dot 167 dot camel at bordewijk dot wildebeest dot org>
>>> On 01.06.15 at 11:17, <mjw@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 15:16 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> opcodes/
>> 2015-04-16 Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
>>
>> * i386-opc.tbl: New IntelSyntax entries for vcvt{,u}si2s{d,s}.
>> * i386-tbl.h: Regenerate.
>
> After this went in all gdb buildbot slave builds started failing:
> http://gdb-build.sergiodj.net/waterfall
>
> ../../binutils-gdb/opcodes/i386-tbl.h:76775:9: error: (near
> initialization for âi386_optab[4370].cpu_flags.bitfield.cpuamd64â)
> [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
>
> Did something go wrong with regenerating i386-tbl.h after commit 5db04?
Fix pushed - thanks for letting me know, and sorry for the breakage.
Jan