Re: [committed, PATCH] Remove Disp16|Disp32 from 64-bit direct branches

["H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>]

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:48 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>>> perhaps also that CpuAMD64 and CpuIntel64 would imply Cpu64 (as
>>> their names already suggest).
>>
>> They are just a bit.  Make them to implement Cpu64 means adding more
>> codes to x86 assembler without any benefit.  If you can share with me
>> what you have in mind, I will see what I can do.
>
> Ah, no, I didn't mean the assembler to do more work. Instead I
> thought that the generator utility could set Cpu64 alongside either
> of the new ones, thus keeping the opcode table slightly better
> readable.

Sure. We will do that when we add CPU_AMD64_FLAGS, like:

  { "CPU_AMD64_FLAGS",
    "CpuAMD64|Cpu64" },

I haven't found a need for it yet.

-- 
H.J.