This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Contributing FreeBSD/aarch64 support
- From: Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd dot org>
- To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- Cc: binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 16:29:53 -0500
- Subject: Re: Contributing FreeBSD/aarch64 support
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAPyFy2CuDQ3G=J32SmZ-_frpyBMeiq5HZujm8BJE_+tbJ2Jg6g at mail dot gmail dot com> <CA+=Sn1mkG2qOqP7pZuqwmHinW3LxuiTdPE10q0yB2t0iOK3LTw at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAPyFy2CQn2L=2tY6aXynZP1rc3aZy-H8PcQGOwNhvURKbPyc9Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAPyFy2DrVNaNDP2r2qs8rf9pQtVvHbnXvd4Wzi17tV2z6reG2w at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAMe9rOot9=fhFVbAazxUuefZ7jnpgNqHOH0aDN60MFE+RLEv3g at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 9 February 2015 at 16:05, H.J. Lu <email@example.com> wrote:
> Do you get clean results for "make check" with clang?
> If not, I don't see why we should change source for clang.
Mostly, yes. There was one unexpected gas failure when I ran it just
now. I configured with --disable-gdb since there's a lot that's not
working there at the moment.
> You can always configure binutils with --disable-werror.
Perhaps not a bad idea since Clang and GCC may have different warnings
over time. I think this should be done by the configure script if
that's the way you want to go though - do you agree?