This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH 0/8] PR ld/17878: Add and use bfd_maybe_object_p
- From: Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>
- To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 12:23:33 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] PR ld/17878: Add and use bfd_maybe_object_p
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20150205135202 dot GA27146 at gmail dot com>
> On 05 Feb 2015, at 14:52, H.J. Lu <email@example.com> wrote:
> Tests are added to verify if nm, ar and ld can properly handle LTO IR
> stored in plain text file.
> Use bfd_maybe_object_p in elf64-ia64-vms.c
> Use bfd_maybe_object_p in vms-alpha.c
> Use bfd_maybe_object_p in vms-lib.c
> Use bfd_maybe_object_p in xcofflink.c
> Use bfd_maybe_object_p in ecoff.c
> Use bfd_maybe_object_p in coff-rs6000.c
None of these formats supports LTO (even less LLVM LTO), so I
assume they were modified for uniformity, right ?