This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [AArch64/PATCH 0/2 (v2)] XGene-1 and XGene-2 assembly targets
- From: Marcus Shawcroft <marcus dot shawcroft at gmail dot com>
- To: Will Newton <will dot newton at linaro dot org>
- Cc: Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>, Matthias Klose <doko at ubuntu dot com>, Christophe Lyon <christophe dot lyon at linaro dot org>, Philipp Tomsich <philipp dot tomsich at theobroma-systems dot com>, Binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:02:13 +0000
- Subject: Re: [AArch64/PATCH 0/2 (v2)] XGene-1 and XGene-2 assembly targets
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1416308791-62583-1-git-send-email-philipp dot tomsich at theobroma-systems dot com> <546B2BCE dot 2010604 at ubuntu dot com> <CAKdteObGcoAVAj8txnVm5kJsvw36n0DeC9PUsARwy14g0z8-2Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <4C8FB917-08C6-4E1A-A7D3-DD5598F07337 at adacore dot com> <CAFqB+Pw3N2+p4BN7U5w6buk4VVkVgbHVA9pZeqjJZrDHABYRqQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CANu=DmjJ6yGe1tD4WXjB6w-0cT652PDHoS_dNVjjkEiDHGc5MQ at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 18 November 2014 13:59, Will Newton <email@example.com> wrote:
> FWIW the patches have been backported into Linaro toolchains, but I
> have no strong opinion either was as I don't think the flag is that
> widely used.
But the fact that they are backported to the monthly linaro releases
suggests to me that the safest route is to keep the alias and remove
the risk of surprising someone.