This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
[Patch]: fix arm-eabi build failure on non-C99 systems
- From: Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>
- To: "binutils at sourceware dot org Development" <binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:21:52 +0200
- Subject: [Patch]: fix arm-eabi build failure on non-C99 systems
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
Hello,
gas/config/tc-arm.c uses int64_t, which isn't available on non C99 compliant systems (like mingw32).
As bfd provides typedef for these types, better to use them.
No regression for arm-eabi.
Ok to commit ?
Tristan.
gas/
2014-09-16 Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>
* config/tc-arm.c (move_or_literal_pool, add_to_lit_pool): Use
bfd_int64_t instead of int64_t.
index cd3db2b..5077f87 100644
--- a/gas/config/tc-arm.c
+++ b/gas/config/tc-arm.c
@@ -3200,7 +3200,7 @@ add_to_lit_pool (unsigned int nbytes)
imm1 = inst.operands[1].imm;
imm2 = (inst.operands[1].regisimm ? inst.operands[1].reg
: inst.reloc.exp.X_unsigned ? 0
- : ((int64_t) inst.operands[1].imm) >> 32);
+ : ((bfd_int64_t) inst.operands[1].imm) >> 32);
if (target_big_endian)
{
imm1 = imm2;
@@ -7812,7 +7812,7 @@ move_or_literal_pool (int i, enum lit_type t, bfd_boolean mode_3)
? inst.operands[1].reg
: inst.reloc.exp.X_unsigned
? 0
- : ((int64_t)((int) immlo)) >> 32;
+ : ((bfd_int64_t)((int) immlo)) >> 32;
int cmode = neon_cmode_for_move_imm (immlo, immhi, FALSE, &immbits,
&op, 64, NT_invtype);