This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: nios2 as asserttion

On 8/29/2014 5:35 AM, Nicholas Clifton wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>> The nios2 build of gcc 4.9.1 with binutils 2.20
> Is there a particular reason that you are using binutils 2.20 and not 
> 2.24 ?  I am guessing that this bug is probably fixed in 2.24.  (I am 
> able to build a nios2-rtem4.11 toolchain locally using 4.9 and binutils 
> master sources).
This may be an interesting case for RTEMS. We have a Python based build
system now like BSD packages which fetches source and builds it. I did
NOT have the ${prefix} in my PATH but it was picked up by the RTEMS
Source Builder. The ${prefix} had an older toolset in it.

The RSB built binutils 2.24 but ${prefix} had 2.20 and I guess RSB
added the ${prefix}/bin to my PATH and gcc/as referred to 2.20. 

Removing the nios2 tools that were install at ${prefix} seems to
have fixed it.

Sorry for the false alert.
> Cheers
>    Nick

Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development        On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available                (256) 722-9985

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]