This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: small request regarding commits in binutils-gdb.git

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
To: Fred Cooke <fred dot cooke at gmail dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>, Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>, binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 21:41:37 -0500
Subject: Re: small request regarding commits in binutils-gdb.git
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <20140115121251 dot GM4639 at adacore dot com> <201401151502 dot 09189 dot vapier at gentoo dot org> <CABZhLO8Kg_RgXGADyKPB15hFE5stZsxyVhN87mhyyX=s5RAkKA at mail dot gmail dot com>

On Wednesday 15 January 2014 20:41:16 Fred Cooke wrote:
> Fair call, though the commit message format requirements might become
> a bit onerous if done this way, OR, generation might generate quite a
> few errors/misprints. I guess the rate of commits is pretty low, and
> commit size pretty big, on average, for binutils, though.

commit message format isn't really any more onerous than maintaining a 
ChangeLog file by hand

i don't know how other projects handle typos/updates.  maybe they just live 
with them.  i haven't looked too closely at the scripts in use, but should be 
easy to ask.
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

References:
- small request regarding commits in binutils-gdb.git
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: small request regarding commits in binutils-gdb.git
  - From: Mike Frysinger
- Re: small request regarding commits in binutils-gdb.git
  - From: Fred Cooke

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]