This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: small request regarding commits in binutils-gdb.git
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Cary Coutant <ccoutant at google dot com>
- Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>, Binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>, gdb-patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:45:27 -0700
- Subject: Re: small request regarding commits in binutils-gdb.git
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20140115121251 dot GM4639 at adacore dot com> <CAHACq4o_L+s_U2ew-2emAAKLFXYRrrVhc_ozeO3icynNNNYK1A at mail dot gmail dot com>
>>>>> "Cary" == Cary Coutant <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> For the rest of the community, using a meaningful subject, one that
>> actually gives a hint at what it does, is something that I have
>> found to be really helpful. For instance, "Provide format string
>> to as_warn" can be more helpful when scanning through a list
>> of commits than "PR gas/16434".
Cary> This is all good, but could you clarify what the conventions are now
Cary> for where the "PR gas/16434" needs to go in order for the patch to get
Cary> sent to bugzilla?
It will work as long as it appears anywhere in the commit message.