This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 0/5] New target port: Andes 'nds32'. (Introduction)

From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw at lug-owl dot de>
To: éåé <kuanlinchentw at gmail dot com>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 19:05:15 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] New target port: Andes 'nds32'. (Introduction)
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <CAJr6u0ir97=7edXrzT14Ay_05uEYsyHEszdEscxW5oD4AsKKFQ at mail dot gmail dot com>

Hi!

On Mon, 2013-07-08 16:27:15 +0800, éåé <kuanlinchentw@gmail.com> wrote:
> On behalf of Andes Technology Co., we send this patch series for a
> binutils port to ânds32â which is a new high-performance/low-power
> 32-bit RISC processor.  Besides binutils, we also finished full
> toolcahin port including GCC, GDB, Newlib, OpenOCD.

Right now, the nds32 port is accepted for GCC, but binutils support
still isn't upstream.

  There are already some new patches based on Joseph's comments. As
well as updates to Andes's binutils fork containing the nds32 patches.
Maybe it's time for a new submission/review round? Or are Joseph's
concerns already fixed by the last patchset sent to the list (so that
these patches could be committed?)

MfG, JBG

-- 
      Jan-Benedict Glaw      jbglaw@lug-owl.de              +49-172-7608481
Signature of:                   ...und wenn Du denkst, es geht nicht mehr,
the second  :                          kommt irgendwo ein Lichtlein her.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]