This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Suggestion] about h8/300 architecture in gcc and binutils

On 09/13/2013 01:02 PM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
> 2013/9/13 Chen Gang <>:
>> > On 09/13/2013 01:09 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> >> On 09/11/2013 10:38 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>>>> >>> Hello all:
>>>> >>>
> [...]
>>>> >>> currently, I only send 3 bugs: Bug58256, Bug58400, Bug58401, the other
>>>> >>> bugs may duplicate with these bugs, so I do not send (if they are also
>>>> >>> valuable, I will send too).
>>>> >>>
> [...]
>>> >> Please include the preprocessed source.  The easiest way to get that is
>>> >> to add the "-save-temps" option to the command line.  That will create a
>>> >> .i file which is the self-contained preprocessed code.  We need that to
>>> >> be able to debug these issues.
>>> >>
>> >
>> > I put related ".i" files to all related bugs, please check, thanks.
>> >
> [...]
>> >
>> > Welcome any additional information or suggestions. :-)
>> >
> It seems that all of your cases (PR58256, PR58400, PR58401) are
> related to compilation error.  I think the next step is to reduce the
> self-contained code that reproduces the same error for easily debugging. :)

Yeah, that sounds good, thanks.

It is easy to exclude some lines to let it pass compiling, we can get
the 2 .i files to compare (one include the related some lines, the other
exclude them).  I will also do it during week-end.

And excuse me, during these days, I have to do internal things within my
company, but at least, I should still try to fix one of them within a
week (the end time is 2013-09-19), especially with many members' help.


Chen Gang

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]