This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Automated Toolchain Building and Testing
- From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
- To: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw at lug-owl dot de>
- Cc: Rainer Orth <ro at cebitec dot uni-bielefeld dot de>, Samuel Mi <samuel dot miing at gmail dot com>, binutils at sourceware dot org, gcc <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 07:21:28 -0400
- Subject: Re: Automated Toolchain Building and Testing
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20130827195417 dot GA29134 at lug-owl dot de> <CAG3=hgsX4vXg8tT8SQMr-=MjjN23LoKp5s5vfhRABxcR-j8ttA at mail dot gmail dot com> <20130828170259 dot GE29134 at lug-owl dot de> <ydd8uzknbdr dot fsf at lokon dot CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE> <20130829100207 dot GH29134 at lug-owl dot de>
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Jan-Benedict Glaw <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-08-29 10:34:40 +0200, Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> wrote:
>> I honestly wouldn't worry about such legacy systems: their respective
>> maintainers take care of testing them, and it would be hard nowadays to
>> even find both hardware and OS media to set up a new system.
> Well, I do.
That's fine, but I don't think we should not hold a good solution in
the quest for the perfect one. How about we start with this version?
Whoever is interested in extending it to other systems, can do it
I have not yet caught up to the whole thread, but I suppose the
possibility of running it on the Compile Farm has been discussed?