This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFC: Use .plt section sh_entsize instead of GET_PLT_ENTRY_SIZE


>>> On 09.08.13 at 19:16, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> We need to increase x86-64 PLT entry size to 32 bytes to
> support Intel MPX.  But elf_x86_64_plt_sym_val uses the
> hardcoded PLT entry size and disassembler can't deal
> with a different PLT entry size.  For x86-64, PLT entry size
> is the same as .plt section sh_entsize.  We can use it instead.
> This assumes .sh_entsize is set correctly.  Both ld and gold
> handle it properly.  Will this change cause any problems?

Wasn't your plan to support a mixture of 16- and 32-byte
entries? In which case considering the entry size to be 16
would remain to be correct?

Jan


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]