This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Call of weakly referenced functions
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
- To: Sebastian Huber <sebastian dot huber at embedded-brains dot de>
- Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 16:17:24 -0700
- Subject: Re: Call of weakly referenced functions
- References: <51E6F279 dot 20109 at embedded-brains dot de>
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
> I have a question regarding the call of weakly referenced functions. On ARM
> for example we have this:
>
> extern void weak(void);
>
> __attribute__((weak)) extern void weak(void);
>
> void _start(void)
> {
> weak();
> }
>
> GCC output:
>
> .global _start
> .type _start, %function
> _start:
> @ Function supports interworking.
> @ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0
> @ frame_needed = 0, uses_anonymous_args = 0
> stmfd sp!, {r3, lr}
> bl weak
> ldmfd sp!, {r3, lr}
> bx lr
> .size _start, .-_start
> .weak weak
>
> Linker output:
>
> 00008444 <_start>:
> 8444: e92d4008 push {r3, lr}
> 8448: e1a00000 nop ; (mov r0, r0)
> 844c: e8bd4008 pop {r3, lr}
> 8450: e12fff1e bx lr
>
> So this looks really nice. Does this work on all ELF targets supported by
> the GNU linker?
No. I'm surprised that this happens on ARM. I would expect the
program to crash.
Ian