This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] bfd/elf64-aarch64.c: Remove dead code.

From: Yufeng Zhang <Yufeng dot Zhang at arm dot com>
To: Will Newton <will dot newton at linaro dot org>
Cc: "binutils at sourceware dot org" <binutils at sourceware dot org>, Patch Tracking <patches at linaro dot org>, Marcus Shawcroft <Marcus dot Shawcroft at arm dot com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 13:23:23 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bfd/elf64-aarch64.c: Remove dead code.
References: <5190D5BB dot 3040601 at linaro dot org> <CANu=DmhsoH51+4xGZ7e=yLKH4k8YhUrVpqkRJbbydok3ofjt_A at mail dot gmail dot com>

Looks OK to me (but I cannot approve it).

Yufeng

On 05/20/13 09:20, Will Newton wrote:

On 13 May 2013 12:59, Will Newton<will.newton@linaro.org>  wrote:


The relocs_copied member is never assigned a non-NULL value, so
this code does not appear to be used.

2013-05-13  Will Newton<will.newton@linaro.org>

         * bfd/elf64-aarch64.c (elf64_aarch64_link_hash_entry): Remove
         relocs_copied member.
         (elf64_aarch64_link_hash_newfunc): Remove initialization of
         relocs_copied member.
         (elf64_aarch64_copy_indirect_symbol): Remove code to copy
         relocs_copied member.
---
  bfd/elf64-aarch64.c | 55 -----------------------------------------------------
  1 file changed, 55 deletions(-)


Ping?

--
Will Newton
Toolchain Working Group, Linaro

References:
- [PATCH] bfd/elf64-aarch64.c: Remove dead code.
  - From: Will Newton
- Re: [PATCH] bfd/elf64-aarch64.c: Remove dead code.
  - From: Will Newton

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]