This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
"C9" constructors in mangled names
- From: Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>
- To: binutils at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 20:47:49 -0700
- Subject: "C9" constructors in mangled names
I ran into a bunch of symbols coming out of g++ 4.6.3 + coverity
that c++filt couldn't handle:
etc. Oddly, when I tried to reproduce the build more simply, all I
were names that had C1 and C2 in them, not C9.
Piping the symbols through sed s/C9/C1/ before cfilt++ made everything happy.
I did find one mention about this,
so it isn't just me :-)
Should binutils handle the C9 symbols? What is it that triggers gcc
to generate them?