This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH] [MIPS] Add mips*el-rtems stubs
- From: Joel Sherrill <Joel dot Sherrill at OARcorp dot com>
- To: Ralf Corsepius <ralf dot corsepius at googlemail dot com>
- Cc: Jia Liu <proljc at gmail dot com>, "binutils at sourceware dot org" <binutils at sourceware dot org>, "ralf dot corsepius at rtems dot org" <ralf dot corsepius at rtems dot org>, "rdsandiford at googlemail dot com" <rdsandiford at googlemail dot com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:24:57 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] [MIPS] Add mips*el-rtems stubs
I agree with Ralf.
Jai. Post the entire tool chain patch set and RTEMS changes to the rtems-devel mailing list. For something like this, we just want to make sure all the bits are there and line up.
Then once that review is done, it can go upstream.
--joel
Ralf Corsepius <ralf.corsepius@googlemail.com> wrote:
On 10/30/2012 12:21 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Jia Liu <proljc@gmail.com> writes:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm working on several MIPS64-based processors, RTEMS is a part of my SDK.
>> When I build a mips64el toolchain for RTEMS, I found that mips*el support
>> has beed removed, so, I try to take it back.
>>
>> This patch is tested, and the RTEMS patch will summitted by a friend at ICT.
>
> This looks good in principle. It was Ralf (cc:ed) who removed the port
> originally,
I don't recall me having done so ;) It probably was removed, because
there currently is no mips*el port in RTEMS
> so once he's happy that the port has indeed been resurrected
> from an RTEMS POV,
Well, I don't have any problem in a mips64el target being added to RTEMS
and its toolchains, but so far, this does not apply.
> I'll go ahead and apply it.
I am uncertain on how to proceed. Without the missing other components
(RTEMS, newlib, gcc (+ gdb)) also being submitted, adding a mips64el to
binutils doesn't make much sense.
Ralf