This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: PATCH: Add a testcase for PR binutils/14481
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Thomas Schwinge
<thomas@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 04:28:59 -0700, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Thomas Schwinge
>> <thomas@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:32:55 -0700, "H.J. Lu" <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> wrote:
>> >> I checkec in this patch to add a testcase for PR binutils/14481.
>> >
>> >> --- a/binutils/ChangeLog
>> >> +++ b/binutils/ChangeLog
>> >> @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
>> >> +2012-08-16 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
>> >> +
>> >> + PR binutils/14481
>> >> + * Makefile.am (BFDTEST1_PROG): New.
>> >> + (TEST_PROGS): Likewise.
>> >> + (bfdtest1_DEPENDENCIES): Likewise.
>> >> + (noinst_PROGRAMS): Add $(TEST_PROGS).
>> >> + * Makefile.in: Regenerated.
>> >> +
>> >> + * bfdtest1.c: New file.
>> >> +
>> >
>> >> --- a/binutils/testsuite/ChangeLog
>> >> +++ b/binutils/testsuite/ChangeLog
>> >> @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
>> >> +2012-08-16 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
>> >> +
>> >> + PR binutils/14481
>> >> + * ar.exp (bfdtest1): New.
>> >> + (long_filenames): Run bfdtest1.
>> >> + (thin_archive): Likewise.
>> >> + (thin_archive_with_nested): Likewise.
>> >
>> >> diff --git a/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/ar.exp b/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/ar.exp
>> >> index 0caa847..c66c43e 100644
>> >> --- a/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/ar.exp
>> >> +++ b/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/ar.exp
>> >> @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ if ![is_remote host] {
>> >> }
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> +set bfdtest1 [findfile $base_dir/bfdtest1]
>> >
>> > This is not correct for cross-testing on a Windows host, and results in a
>> > bunch of ERRORs about the file not being found. Here is a patch -- OK to
>> > commit?
>>
>> diff --git a/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/ar.exp b/binutils/testsuite/binutil
>> s-all/ar.exp
>> index 05cc261..8b7629e 100644
>> --- a/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/ar.exp
>> +++ b/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/ar.exp
>> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ if ![is_remote host] {
>> }
>> }
>>
>> -set bfdtest1 [findfile $base_dir/bfdtest1]
>> +set bfdtest1 $base_dir/bfdtest1
>>
>> # send_user "Version [binutil_version $AR]"
>>
>> Can you try this instead?
>
> Yes, that seems a reasonable change anyway (no need ever to transform
> bfdtest1), and it also solves the Windows host issue: Windows allows
> running executables without specifying the .exe suffix.
>
I checked in
diff --git a/binutils/testsuite/ChangeLog b/binutils/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 6514b1a..6745baa 100644
--- a/binutils/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/binutils/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2012-10-24 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
+
+ * binutils-all/ar.exp (bfdtest1): Remove findfile.
+
2012-10-21 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
* binutils-all/dw2-1.W: Updated.
diff --git a/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/ar.exp b/binutils/testsuite/binutil
s-all/ar.exp
index 05cc261..8b7629e 100644
--- a/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/ar.exp
+++ b/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/ar.exp
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ if ![is_remote host] {
}
}
-set bfdtest1 [findfile $base_dir/bfdtest1]
+set bfdtest1 $base_dir/bfdtest1
# send_user "Version [binutil_version $AR]"
> These problems remain:
>
> | Then, with that patch applied, the tests still FAIL on Windows hosts:
> |
> | FAIL: ar long file names (bfdtest1)
> | FAIL: ar thin archive (bfdtest1)
> | FAIL: ar thin archive with nested archive (bfdtest1)
> |
> | The first two will go away (PASS) if I force (by copying it over) the
> | unstripped executable binutils/.libs/bfdtest1.exe to be used instead of
> | the stripped one -- huh. Yet, the last of the three still FAILs.
> | Debugging that is for another day.
>
Those are real Windows target problems.
--
H.J.