This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: bfd_get_full_section_contents memory leak, plus

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Peter Bergner <bergner at vnet dot ibm dot com>
Cc: Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com>, Binutils Development <binutils at sourceware dot org>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 10:51:03 -0600
Subject: Re: bfd_get_full_section_contents memory leak, plus
References: <87391d7px1.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20121018003733.GP4541@bubble.grove.modra.org> <87txtszi9o.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20121018041059.GR4541@bubble.grove.modra.org> <87a9vjzks9.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20121019011343.GA3263@bubble.grove.modra.org> <1350665243.6698.2.camel@otta>

>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Bergner <bergner@vnet.ibm.com> writes:

Peter> I'm now seeing on a powerpc64-linux build:
Peter>   FAIL: Build libbar.so with compressed debug sections
Peter>   FAIL: Run normal with libfoo.so with compressed debug sections

Crud.

I will look into it.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: bfd_get_full_section_contents memory leak, plus
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- bfd_get_full_section_contents memory leak, plus
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: bfd_get_full_section_contents memory leak, plus
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: bfd_get_full_section_contents memory leak, plus
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: bfd_get_full_section_contents memory leak, plus
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: bfd_get_full_section_contents memory leak, plus
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: bfd_get_full_section_contents memory leak, plus
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: bfd_get_full_section_contents memory leak, plus
  - From: Peter Bergner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]