This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Re: [committed] TILE-Gx GOLD: better offset ranges for large got.

From: Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com>
To: Jiong Wang <jiwang at tilera dot com>
Cc: Walter Lee <walt at tilera dot com>, "binutils at sourceware dot org" <binutils at sourceware dot org>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 16:03:05 +0930
Subject: Re: Re: [committed] TILE-Gx GOLD: better offset ranges for large got.
References: <20121003025950.GA25219@bubble.grove.modra.org> <506BC553.4090603@tilera.com> <CA07B7802861CC448EE8D5FA6DE3A15502E807@USCAEXCH1.tad.internal.tilera.com>

On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 06:23:09AM +0000, Jiong Wang wrote:
>   And tilegx do not have x86_64 style got header, we only reserve the first entry in .got which kept the address of .dynamic, all .plt stub will not be affected by the _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ 

So your dynamic loader uses the first entry in the .got section for
the address of .dynamic rather than the entry pointed to by
_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_?

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Re: [committed] TILE-Gx GOLD: better offset ranges for large got.
  - From: Jiong Wang
- RE: Re: [committed] TILE-Gx GOLD: better offset ranges for large got.
  - From: Jiong Wang

References:
- Re: [committed] TILE-Gx GOLD: better offset ranges for large got.
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: Re: [committed] TILE-Gx GOLD: better offset ranges for large got.
  - From: Jiong Wang

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]