This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Release 2.23: Ping
- From: Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>
- To: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: binutils Development <binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 09:50:27 +0200
- Subject: Re: Release 2.23: Ping
- References: <2E74490B-BCE6-4D8E-A6F1-737A1625DAA4@adacore.com> <alpine.DEB.firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Sep 1, 2012, at 12:00 AM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>> as far as I understand, aarch64 was committed in the 2.23 branch. I'd
>> like to thanks for doing this timely.
> Has the 2.23 branch been already created?
> Did I miss anything?
At least the snapshot announcement:
> I have just created the 2.23 branch and uploded prerelease 2.22.90 at:
> asking seriously -- the list server seems to be playing tricks with me, I
> only received one of the replies to your e-mail in this thread and I had
> to poke at the server to send me the rest as a digest, hmm...
>> Is there any patch that need to be in the 2.23 release ? Please, reply
>> quickly as I'd like to do the release soon.
> Well, if the branch was created before last Tuesday, then I'd like my
> export class bug fixes to be included, specifically these:
> If it was even before Aug 13th, then I'd like to see all the bug fixes I
> pushed recently between the time the branch was created and now. This
> trivial documentation fix:
> 2012-08-31 Maciej W. Rozycki <email@example.com>
> * doc/c-mips.texi (MIPS Opts): Correct a typo in the -mips5
> would then be the icing on the cake ;) -- we want our user documentation
> to be always perfectly accurate, don't we?
The branch was created in July, so you need to backport all these patches.
I can take care of that, providing you sent me the url of the binutils-cvs@ messages.