This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [GOLD] advice on powerpc64 .opd handling
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Alan Modra <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:08:13PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> Normally a C array should be std::vector in C++. This should probably be
>> std::vector<unsigned int> ent_shndx_;
>> std::vector<typename elfcpp::Elf_Types<size>::Elf_Off> opd_ent_off_;
> Even when no resizing will be needed?
Yes. The overhead is small.
>> Will this work correctly if the symbol is defined in a SHT_GROUP
>> section that is discarded?
> Hasn't something gone horribly if we're trying to call such a
Seems to me that it's normal for a C++ template instantiation. Maybe
I'm missing something.