This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH] x86/Intel: relax requirements for memory operands
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>>>> On 30.07.12 at 17:59, "H.J. Lu" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>>> MASM accepts ESP/RSP being specified second in a memory address
>>> operand, by silently making it the base register despite not being
>>> specified first.
>>> Consequently, we also permit an xmm/ymm index to be specified first
>>> (possibly alone), nevertheless putting it in as index register.
>>> 2012-07-24 Jan Beulich <email@example.com>
>>> * config/tc-i386-intel.c (i386_intel_simplify_register): Handle
>>> xmm/ymm index register being specified first as well as esp/rsp
>>> base register being specified last in a memory operand.
>> This caused:
>> FAIL: i386 inval-equ-2
>> on Linux/x86.
> No for me, neither on 32- nor on 64-bit host. I also don't see
> how it could - the test case doesn't use Intel syntax, so is
> entirely unaffected by this change. Consequently I have no
> way of fixing this. Please double check that the failure is really
> caused by this change.
I have checked in a fix. Please add some testcases to
verify each of your changes.