This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: PATCH: Print addend as signed in objdump
On Thu, 17 May 2012, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Alan Modra <email@example.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 05:37:15AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson
> >> > Adjusting all test-cases goes along with adjusting objdump, just
> >> > as with readelf. ?Thanks.
> > These all look to be yours too, H.J.
> I checked in a fix to pdate testsuite. But it is hard to tell if I missed
> anything since testsuite on some tarrgets isn't clean.
Sure, it'd be nice and trivial if every target had clean
test-suite results. Still, building without and with your
patch, and finding what failed with diff doesn't seem hard
unless I miss something. Ignoring single test-cases that
already failed but "failing more" with your patch, would IMHO be
BTW beware of updating your binutils tree right now, it's broken
due to the largish #include-header patch.
PS. thanks for the prompt fixing