This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

unintentional license change for texi docs?


A Debian developer pointer out in http://bugs.debian.org/650504, that the
license for some of the bfd documentation was changed back in 2007 as part of a
cleanup, but adding the front and back cover texts.

Log message:
	Use @copying around copyright notices

http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2007-05/msg00122.html

http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/doc/bfd.texinfo.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.14&r2=1.15
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/doc/bfdint.texi.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.20&r2=1.21

The changelog doesn't mention this. If this was unintentional, could this be
reverted (both on the branch and the trunk)? It would help Debian to distribute
the documentation in the main section of the archive.

thanks, Matthias


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]