This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Fix CRIS bug exposed by "MIPS/BFD: Don't make debug section relocs dynamic"
- From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter dot nilsson at axis dot com>
- To: gingold at adacore dot com
- Cc: mikpe at it dot uu dot se, binutils at sourceware dot org, schwab at linux-m68k dot org, maxim at codesourcery dot com
- Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 13:12:26 +0100
- Subject: Re: Fix CRIS bug exposed by "MIPS/BFD: Don't make debug section relocs dynamic"
> From: Tristan Gingold <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 09:12:12 +0100
> On Dec 1, 2011, at 11:46 AM, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > Hans-Peter Nilsson writes:
> >> I see this test fails for m68k-linux too, if someone feels pity
> >> (no listed maintainer).
> >> No regressions tested cris-elf cris-linux.
> >> Can I put this on the 2.22 branch too?
Did you mean to reply to Mikael Pettersson's patch and request
for 2.22? (More likely than replying to me a second time, but
better safe than sorry. :)
Mikael, I don't see you mentioned in copyright.list, so if
unless it's already in progress, I'd suggest you take care of
the GNU copyright assignment paperwork, even if IMHO this
particular patch was a small enough.
> >> bfd:
> >> * elf32-cris.c (cris_elf_check_relocs) <plt accounting for
> >> R_CRIS_8, R_CRIS_16, and R_CRIS_32>: Move early break for
> >> non-SEC_ALLOC sections before GOT and PLT accounting.
> > I've implemented a similar change for elf32-m68k.c which fixes
> > ld-elf/comm-data.exp for m68k-linux, with no testsuite regressions
> > on head or the 2.22 release.
> > As for m68k maintainers, I looked around in recent ChangeLogs,
> > and both Andreas Schwab and Maxim Kuvyrkov seem likely candidates
> > so I've added them to the Cc: list.
> > Ok for head and 2.22 branch?
> > 2011-12-01 Mikael Pettersson <email@example.com>
> > * elf32-m68k.c (elf_m68k_check_relocs) <R_68K_8, R68K_16, R_68K_32>: For
> > non-SEC_ALLOC sections break before GOT and PLT accounting.