This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [MIPS] Add saa and saad instructions for octeon
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Richard Sandiford
> Andrew Pinski <email@example.com> writes:
>> * archures.c (bfd_mach_mips_octeonp): New macro.
>> * bfd-in2.h: Regenerate.
>> * bfd/cpu-mips.c (I_mipsocteonp): New enum value.
>> (arch_info_struct): Add bfd_mach_mips_octeonp.
>> * elfxx-mips.c (mips_set_isa_flags): Add bfd_mach_mips_octeonp.
>> (mips_mach_extensions): Add bfd_mach_mips_octeonp.
>> * config/tc-mips.c (CPU_IS_OCTEON): New macro function.
>> (CPU_HAS_SEQ): Change to use CPU_IS_OCTEON.
>> (NO_ISA_COP): Likewise.
>> (macro) <ld_st>: Add support when off0 is true.
>> Add support for M_SAA_AB, M_SAA_OB, M_SAAD_OB and M_SAAD_AB.
>> (mips_cpu_info_table): Add octeon+.
>> * doc/c-mips.texi: Document octeon+ as an acceptable value for -march=
>> * gas/mips/mips.exp: Add octeon+ for an architecture.
>> Run octeon-saa-saad test.
>> (run_dump_test_arch): For Octeon architectures, also try octeon@.
>> * gas/mips/octeon-pref.d: Remove -march=octeon from command line.
>> * gas/mips/octeon.d: Likewise.
>> * gas/mips/octeon-saa-saad.d: New file.
>> * gas/mips/octeon-saa-saad.s: New file
>> * mips.h (INSN_CHIP_MASK): Update according to INSN_OCTEONP.
>> (INSN_OCTEONP): New macro.
>> (CPU_OCTEONP): New macro.
>> (OPCODE_IS_MEMBER): Add Octeon+.
>> (M_SAA_AB, M_SAAD_AB, M_SAA_OB, M_SAAD_OB): New enum values.
>> * mips-dis.c (mips_arch_choices): Add Octeon+.
>> * mips-opc.c (IOCT): Include Octeon+.
>> (IOCTP): New macro.
>> (mips_builtin_opcodes): Add "saa" and "saad".
> OK, thanks. ÂPlease run the binutils testsuite for a mips*-linux-gnu
> target to make sure there are no alignment problems with the tests.
> If they fail, please either (1) add "#pass" to the dumps or
> (2) add "\.\.\." to the dumps and add:
> # Force at least 8 (non-delay-slot) zero bytes, to make 'objdump' print ...
> Â Â Â Â.align Â2
> Â Â Â Â.space Â8
> to the source (whichever you prefer).
> I might try to combine off0 and off12 into a single variable at some
> point, but that's a logically-separate change that shouldn't be part of
> the main Octeon+ patch.
Can you apply the patch since I don't have write cvs access yet or can
I receive write CVS access?