This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Patching autoconf to support static binutils?
On 8/23/2011 8:25 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday, August 23, 2011 18:32:00 Bryan Ischo wrote:
On 08/22/11 14:40, Bryan Ischo wrote:
Hello out there ... is anyone steering this ship????
Hello. I am trying to figure out how to build a statically linked
version of binutils (starting with binutils source version 2.21.1). I
have found some old discussions of this topic via search results, but
there was never any real resolution to this issue as far as I can tell.
wow, 24 hours w/out a response and you're already getting punchy ? this is
open source which means you get to figure things out yourself if you cant find
help. not bug people even more for their free assistance.
It was meant to be tongue-in-cheek, and I don't think your response is
warranted. Additionally, it is disappointing that you put more effort
into writing this paragraph than to your response below ...
If you'll read my original email you'll note that the above doesn't work
because LDFLAGS is passed to gcc by some of the binutils Makefiles and
gcc doesn't like the -all-static option.