This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Release 2.21.1 ?
- From: Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>
- To: Andreas Krebbel <krebbel at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 09:52:56 +0200
- Subject: Re: Release 2.21.1 ?
- References: <D27CC4D0-B7AF-4D15-9BDB-D52B3C12DAC4@adacore.com> <4DD0D695.1090005@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On May 16, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> On 03/15/2011 09:21 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> now that gcc 4.6 is released, I'd like to know if binutils developers want a new binutils release.
>> Opinions are welcome...
>>
>> [ I think that not all patches have been back-ported, so do not hesitate to ping me ]
>
> Although it isn't a binutils bugfix I need a backport of:
>
> [PATCH] S/390: Support the .machine pseudo
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2011-04/msg00191.html
>
> in a binutils release asap in order to fix a glibc s390 build issue with the iconv modules:
>
> [PATCH] S/390: Use .machine to prevent AS from complaining about z9-109 instructions in
> iconv modules
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2011-04/msg00021.html
>
> Would you accept a backport of this patch in the 2.21 branch?
Yes, that's OK.