This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Problems with linker on Alpha
- From: Michael Cree <mcree at orcon dot net dot nz>
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>
- Cc: debian-alpha at lists dot debian dot org, binutils at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 21:21:18 +1200
- Subject: Re: Problems with linker on Alpha
- References: <4DBCC489.9020602@orcon.net.nz> <4DBF055E.1070701@twiddle.net>
On 03/05/11 07:26, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 04/30/2011 07:25 PM, Michael Cree wrote:
Secondly, I noted a number of test suite failures in the ld component
while building binutils.
"Large number"? I get
[...snip...]
=== ld tests ===
Running target alpha-qemu
FAIL: plugin claimfile lost symbol
FAIL: plugin claimfile replace symbol
FAIL: plugin claimfile resolve symbol
XPASS: Preserve default . = 0
XPASS: Preserve explicit . = 0
=== ld Summary ===
# of expected passes 278
# of unexpected failures 3
# of unexpected successes 2
# of expected failures 7
Building binutils 2.21.51.20110419-2 from Debian (also with my fix tls
patch) I get:
=== ld tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: Build libpr9676-4a.so
FAIL: Build libpr9679.so
FAIL: vers24a
FAIL: vers24b
FAIL: vers24c
FAIL: vers30
FAIL: vers31
FAIL: plugin claimfile lost symbol
FAIL: plugin claimfile replace symbol
FAIL: plugin claimfile resolve symbol
XPASS: Preserve default . = 0
XPASS: Preserve explicit . = 0
=== ld Summary ===
# of expected passes 505
# of unexpected failures 10
# of unexpected successes 2
# of expected failures 34
# of untested testcases 1
I see there's a lot more tests done with the unix target, nevertheless
I'll re-test with binutils master cvs to see if some of those unexpected
failures go away.
Cheers
Michael.