This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Review of --enable-gold=both patch
- From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>
- To: Matthias Klose <doko at ubuntu dot com>
- Cc: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 21:21:36 +0100
- Subject: Re: Review of --enable-gold=both patch
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1006281009290.17565@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <4C2886C7.4040408@gnu.org> <4C28CA2A.7060703@codesourcery.com> <4C28CE9C.9030809@gnu.org> <4C28D9F1.6030309@codesourcery.com> <4CC83135.4080603@ubuntu.com> <4CCA91ED.7010909@redhat.com> <4CCAE033.3010009@ubuntu.com> <4CCAE45F.20201@gnu.org> <4CCAEB12.40004@ubuntu.com>
* Matthias Klose wrote on Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 05:41:06PM CEST:
> Fine with me to implement this, if there is consensus, but it won't be
> before next week.
Whatever you end up implementing, it needs updates to gcc/doc.
I'd say that binutils/README and binutils/doc/binutils.texi could also
benefit from seeing information about gold and these switches, but I'm
not sure about the usual policy here.
Thanks,
Ralf