This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: bfd/elf.c: more wrap/overlap/overflow weirdness

From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 20:43:17 -0700
Subject: Re: bfd/elf.c: more wrap/overlap/overflow weirdness
References: <201008201945.o7KJjjt6018645@greed.delorie.com> <AANLkTin-+N9R5JHCNu1JWd2Z=mT4NF-UP2YKMbqrMd42@mail.gmail.com> <201008210340.o7L3ebSY029518@greed.delorie.com>

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 8:40 PM, DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> X86 kernel may depend address wrapping.
>
> In the ELF file? ?For a single section?
>

I don't remember the detail. You can build 32bit and 64bit x86 kernels
to try them out.

-- 
H.J.

References:
- bfd/elf.c: more wrap/overlap/overflow weirdness
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: bfd/elf.c: more wrap/overlap/overflow weirdness
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: bfd/elf.c: more wrap/overlap/overflow weirdness
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]