This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Remove i386_is_register


How is the e->X_md check not necessary anymore all of the sudden?

Jan

>>> "H.J. Lu"  04/22/10 5:12 AM >>>
There is no need for i386_is_register. I checked in this patch to remove
it.


H.J.
---
diff --git a/gas/ChangeLog b/gas/ChangeLog
index 2e7b73c..a7ac0ae 100644
--- a/gas/ChangeLog
+++ b/gas/ChangeLog
@@ -1,5 +1,13 @@
 2010-04-21  H.J. Lu  
 
+    * config/tc-i386.c (i386_is_register): Removed.
+    (x86_cons): Don't use i386_is_register.
+    (parse_register): Likewise.
+    * config/tc-i386-intel.c (i386_intel_simplify): Likewise.
+    (i386_intel_operand): Likewise.
+
+2010-04-21  H.J. Lu  
+
     * config/tc-i386.c (tc_x86_parse_to_dw2regnum): Don't use
     i386_is_register.
 
diff --git a/gas/config/tc-i386-intel.c b/gas/config/tc-i386-intel.c
index ed8d45c..ea1e6e0 100644
--- a/gas/config/tc-i386-intel.c
+++ b/gas/config/tc-i386-intel.c
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ static int i386_intel_simplify (expressionS *e)
     intel_state.op_modifier = e->X_op;
       /* FALLTHROUGH */
     case O_short:
-      if (i386_is_register (symbol_get_value_expression (e->X_add_symbol)))
+      if (symbol_get_value_expression (e->X_add_symbol)->X_op == O_register)
     {
       as_bad (_("invalid use of register"));
       return 0;
@@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ static int i386_intel_simplify (expressionS *e)
       break;
 
     case O_full_ptr:
-      if (i386_is_register (symbol_get_value_expression (e->X_op_symbol)))
+      if (symbol_get_value_expression (e->X_op_symbol)->X_op == O_register)
     {
       as_bad (_("invalid use of register"));
       return 0;
@@ -857,7 +857,7 @@ i386_intel_operand (char *operand_string, int got_a_float)
         break;
           intel_state.seg = expP->X_add_symbol;
         }
-      if (!i386_is_register (expP))
+      if (expP->X_op != O_register)
         {
           as_bad (_("segment register name expected"));
           return 0;
diff --git a/gas/config/tc-i386.c b/gas/config/tc-i386.c
index 5699581..9640974 100644
--- a/gas/config/tc-i386.c
+++ b/gas/config/tc-i386.c
@@ -3534,14 +3534,6 @@ swap_operands (void)
     }
 }
 
-/* The X_md field is set to register number plus 1 to indicate register
-   expression in Intel syntax.  */
-static int
-i386_is_register (const expressionS *e)
-{
-  return e->X_op == O_register || e->X_md;
-}
-
 /* Try to ensure constant immediates are represented in the smallest
    opcode possible.  */
 static void
@@ -6486,7 +6478,7 @@ x86_cons (expressionS *exp, int size)
       if (exp->X_op == O_constant
           || exp->X_op == O_absent
           || exp->X_op == O_illegal
-          || i386_is_register (exp)
+          || exp->X_op == O_register
           || exp->X_op == O_big)
         {
           char c = *input_line_pointer;
@@ -7965,7 +7957,7 @@ parse_register (char *reg_string, char **end_op)
     {
       const expressionS *e = symbol_get_value_expression (symbolP);
 
-      know (i386_is_register (e));
+      know (e->X_op == O_register);
       know (e->X_add_number >= 0
         && (valueT) e->X_add_number < i386_regtab_size);
       r = i386_regtab + e->X_add_number;


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]