This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [libbfd] Mach-O format support ?

From: Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>
To: mpsuzuki at hiroshima-u dot ac dot jp
Cc: fleury at labri dot fr, binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:49:02 +0200
Subject: Re: [libbfd] Mach-O format support ?
References: <4BC488C6.8090203@labri.fr> <B4961C12-7468-4CF5-B6F6-E11F22D59F2F@adacore.com> <4BC577D6.6050801@labri.fr> <0708B593-97DB-499D-A89B-ED70E8573F46@adacore.com> <20100414173947.680bc9cc.mpsuzuki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp>

On Apr 14, 2010, at 10:39 AM, mpsuzuki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> How about "nm" for universal binary?

nm on universal binary works too.

> If I execute "nm" of latest binutils (downloaded from CVS)
> and try for universal binary archive (/usr/lib/libwrap.a)
> on Mac OS X, "nm" complains as:
> 
> $ ./nm-new /usr/lib/libwrap.a 
> ./nm-new: /usr/lib/libwrap.a:i386: File format not recognized
> ./nm-new: /usr/lib/libwrap.a:powerpc:common: File format not recognized

Yes, nm on universal archive doesn't work, because nm doesn't handle archives of archives!

Tristan.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [libbfd] Mach-O format support ?
  - From: mpsuzuki

References:
- [libbdf] Mach-O format support ?
  - From: Emmanuel Fleury
- Re: [libbdf] Mach-O format support ?
  - From: Tristan Gingold
- Re: [libbdf] Mach-O format support ?
  - From: Emmanuel Fleury
- Re: [libbdf] Mach-O format support ?
  - From: Tristan Gingold
- Re: [libbfd] Mach-O format support ?
  - From: mpsuzuki

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]