This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [Patch]: upgrade to automake 1.11.1
- From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>
- To: Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>
- Cc: Binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>, jim at meyering dot net
- Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 09:21:25 +0200
- Subject: Re: [Patch]: upgrade to automake 1.11.1
- References: <4CC4EBAB-2BE1-428D-BBB5-560CFED33DDE@adacore.com> <20100331082751.GC23926@ins.uni-bonn.de> <A0562074-A34A-4F0D-AD97-459372CB7659@adacore.com> <20100331084451.GD23926@ins.uni-bonn.de> <514663BC-081B-4777-A20F-B1D000191E37@adacore.com>
* Tristan Gingold wrote on Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:49:03AM CEST:
> On Mar 31, 2010, at 10:44 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Tristan Gingold wrote on Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:34:15AM CEST:
> >> On Mar 31, 2010, at 10:27 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >>> * Tristan Gingold wrote on Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:20:43AM CEST:
> >>>> I have regenerated files using 1.11.1
> >>>
> >>> I'd have preferred to avoid version churn between binutils and GCC,
> >>> at this GCC stage, for a purely administrative issue.
> >>
> >> Why not updating GCC ?
> >
> > Because it is in Stage 4, and it doesn't use the 'dist' rule either.
> > Hmm, it contains it in some places as dead code though, where neither
> > 'no-dist' nor 'cygnus' options are enabled. Oh well. Guess better to
> > upgrade src and GCC at the same time then.
>
> Ok. Can you take care of the GCC update ?
Done for trunk.
Cheers,
Ralf