This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: Assign regions to orphan sections

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, binutils at sourceware dot org, "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:55:16 -0700
Subject: Re: RFC: Assign regions to orphan sections
References: <20100315221743.GQ9310@caradoc.them.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1003252212320.28769@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20100325221611.GS9310@caradoc.them.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1003252226570.28769@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20100325223415.GU9310@caradoc.them.org>

Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com> writes:

> I don't think the file header should be loaded in your case, either.
> Anyone know what determines this?  It's not triggered by use of
> SIZEOF_HEADERS, I don't think.

It's done by default if it can be done.  Look at phdr_in_segment in
_bfd_elf_map_sections_to_segments in bfd/elf.c.

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: Assign regions to orphan sections
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

References:
- RFC: Assign regions to orphan sections
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: RFC: Assign regions to orphan sections
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: RFC: Assign regions to orphan sections
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: RFC: Assign regions to orphan sections
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: RFC: Assign regions to orphan sections
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]