This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [09/11] TI C6X binutils port: binutils/


On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, DJ Delorie wrote:

> > The gABI says that 64-255 is "Architecture-specific value range".
> > It is not possible to interpret values in that range outside the
> > context of a particular e_machine value.
> 
> I guess I'm OK with it, although it seems a step backward.  At least
> we always print a number if not a name.

I think of this as exactly the same as all the other cases where we look 
up particular ELF values in the context of an e_machine value (and for 
which I added C6X cases) - for example, what get_dynamic type does for 
values between DT_LOPROC and DT_HIPROC.  That is, as a bug fix made 
necessary by C6X using values known also to be used on other 
architectures.

Is the binutils/ patch all OK now?

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]