This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: m68k padding between methods at ld time

From: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
To: Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at OARcorp dot com>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, "binutils at sourceware dot org" <binutils at sourceware dot org>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:30:58 +0100
Subject: Re: m68k padding between methods at ld time
References: <4ABF9919.2070909@oarcorp.com> <4AC0773F.1060501@redhat.com> <4AC0BA51.3080908@oarcorp.com> <4AC1D476.6090606@redhat.com> <mcreippdccx.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com> <4AC222BB.1060003@oarcorp.com>

Hi Joel,

I saw gaps between methods and they were being filled
with rts (0x4e75) instead of nop (0x4e71).

In which case changing the definition of NOP does make sense. So I have applied your patch to the mainline and branch sources.

Cheers
  Nick

References:
- m68k padding between methods at ld time
  - From: Joel Sherrill
- Re: m68k padding between methods at ld time
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: m68k padding between methods at ld time
  - From: Joel Sherrill
- Re: m68k padding between methods at ld time
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: m68k padding between methods at ld time
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: m68k padding between methods at ld time
  - From: Joel Sherrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]