This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] More DWARF-4 support

From: Cary Coutant <ccoutant at google dot com>
To: tromey at redhat dot com
Cc: Binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:32:30 -0700
Subject: Re: [patch] More DWARF-4 support
References: <c17be2b30908191719u51ac2dcak45e376ab3aa544f7@mail.gmail.com> <m3eiqvor1l.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

> Cary> ? (DW_AT_main_subprogram, DW_AT_data_bit_offset, DW_AT_const_expr,
> Cary> ? DW_AT_enum_class, DW_AT_linkage_name, DW_AT_GNU_guarded_by,
> Cary> ? DW_AT_GNU_pt_guarded_by, DW_AT_GNU_guarded, DW_AT_GNU_pt_guarded,
> Cary> ? DW_AT_GNU_locks_excluded, DW_AT_GNU_exclusive_locks_required,
> Cary> ? DW_AT_GNU_shared_locks_required, DW_AT_GNU_odr_signature): New
> Cary> ? attributes.
>
> Where are these GNU extensions documented?
>
> I think dwarf2.h should refer to the documentation for all extensions.
> Undocumented extensions have already caused problems for people writing
> new readers.

Good point. They're described in the following document:

   http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dchhtd34_75dz7zbjgq

Is a pointer to that sufficient?

-cary

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] More DWARF-4 support
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- [patch] More DWARF-4 support
  - From: Cary Coutant
- Re: [patch] More DWARF-4 support
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]