This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: dependency tracking in ld

From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
To: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:28:39 +0930
Subject: Re: dependency tracking in ld
References: <20090815124234.GA20656@gmx.de> <20090815124327.GB20656@gmx.de> <m3d46uifai.fsf@google.com> <20090818184815.GF30742@gmx.de>

On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 08:48:15PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Of the patch series in this email thread, only this patch you have
> replied to (plus the above quoted EXTRA_ld_new_SOURCES line):
> <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.binutils/42956/focus=42957>
> still need approval.

Looks good to me.  OK to apply.  We can look at passing the various
-D options to all ld files later.

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM

Follow-Ups:
- One issue with ld
  - From: He Yunlong-B20256

References:
- dependency tracking in ld bfd binutils gas gprof opcodes
  - From: Ralf Wildenhues
- Re: dependency tracking in ld
  - From: Ralf Wildenhues
- Re: dependency tracking in ld
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: dependency tracking in ld
  - From: Ralf Wildenhues

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]