This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

RE: [PATCH] Add FMA4 support in binutils

From: "rajagopal, dwarak" <dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: <binutils at sourceware dot org>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:49:49 -0500
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Add FMA4 support in binutils
References: <E7FB0F2BB5FEF242BB2929F02A12B8F337501A@SAUSEXMB2.amd.com> <6dc9ffc80907060907w1c0b4acejf24695a3cbe472b7@mail.gmail.com> <E7FB0F2BB5FEF242BB2929F02A12B8F3375031@SAUSEXMB2.amd.com> <6dc9ffc80907060916j27eb4054o6c415a128a83f914@mail.gmail.com>

> Then please put back the exact assembler/disassembler patches
> I reverted since they were tested extensively. Please pay attentions
> to white spaces/blank lines and avoid long comment lines.
> 

I can't use the exact same patches as it includes removal of vpermilp*
and also addition of Intel FMA instructions. I have used the same code
wherever possible since they are already extensively tested as you
mentioned.

I have corrected white spaces/blank lines and long comments in my
patches.
Is this Ok? I'm currently testing it.

Thanks,
Dwarak

Attachment: fma4.diff
Description: fma4.diff

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Add FMA4 support in binutils
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH] Add FMA4 support in binutils
  - From: Tristan Gingold

References:
- [PATCH] Add FMA4 support in binutils
  - From: rajagopal, dwarak
- Re: [PATCH] Add FMA4 support in binutils
  - From: H.J. Lu
- RE: [PATCH] Add FMA4 support in binutils
  - From: rajagopal, dwarak
- Re: [PATCH] Add FMA4 support in binutils
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]