This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH/RFC] Fix LD test FAIL: weak symbols on Cygwin

From: "Aaron W. LaFramboise" <aaron98wiridge9 at aaronwl dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>, binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:14:31 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Fix LD test FAIL: weak symbols on Cygwin
References: <49BF3D78.7070706@gmail.com> <49C02598.4020101@aaronwl.com> <6dc9ffc80903171729r1d17837bg15785b5e0f93dbb9@mail.gmail.com>

H.J. Lu wrote:

FWIW, there is always

FAIL: weak symbols

in ld when configured for i386-cygwin hosted on Linux/ia32. It has been failing
ever since it was enabled by

OK, then maybe this is just broken on Cygwin. I've never worked on Cygwin specifically in the toolchain. All I know is it works or used to work on i386-pc-mingw32. I don't see any good reason these two targets should be different, though.

I will have to look into it before commenting further.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH/RFC] Fix LD test FAIL: weak symbols on Cygwin
  - From: H.J. Lu

References:
- [PATCH/RFC] Fix LD test FAIL: weak symbols on Cygwin
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: [PATCH/RFC] Fix LD test FAIL: weak symbols on Cygwin
  - From: Aaron W. LaFramboise
- Re: [PATCH/RFC] Fix LD test FAIL: weak symbols on Cygwin
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]